Hainan reassigns land for 620,000 homes for industrial use
Loss of revenue for Chinese province, gain of support from President Xi Jinping

Enormous parcels of land in Hainan Island, previously designated for residential development, will be reassigned for industrial use, government officials announced Monday.
The move is in keeping with Beijing’s vision of transforming the island, part of China’s southernmost province, into the country’s largest free-trade zone (FTZ).
Covering 20.7 million square metres, the land would have yielded about 620,000 homes, representing a gross floor area of 62 million square metrEs.
The Hainan government is expected to collect far less revenues with the reassignment as industrial land prices in the island are merely 12 percent of those for commercial and residential land.
At an average price of CNY1,000 (USD148) per square metre, the sale of land for residential use would have earned the Hainan government CNY62 billion or 92 percent of its 2017 fiscal revenue.
“Hainan is exploring a path that will help shake off an addiction to land sales. It wants to foster industries that steadily contribute towards taxes, which is a more sustainable path,” Zhao Xiuchi, a professor at Capital University of Economics and Business in Beijing, told the South China Morning Post.
The loss of revenue is a tradeoff for support from President Xi Jinping, who announced in April that Hainan would be declared a free-trade zone. Priority will be given to tourism and technology, among other sectors, in the island widely known as the “Hawaii of China”.
Recommended
Investors double down on Jakarta despite Nusantara’s political rise
Density, demand, and capital flows continue to anchor real estate momentum in Greater Jakarta
Hong Kong’s deadliest blaze in decades triggers stricter safety rules
But enforcement is the real test
A conversation with ThirdHome founder Wade Shealy
How luxury exchange reshapes home ownership, travel, and asset use
Trade politics and domestic fragility test the Philippines’ property market
How global uncertainty and internal divisions are redrawing the outlook






